|
Here is a riddle: "I don't
have much hair, I don't have all my teeth, I have trouble
walking, I need help dressing myself, I am often misunderstood,
and I sometimes feel unwanted. Who am I?"
If you guessed "a
toddler", you are correct. If you guessed "an elderly
person", right again. These two groups have much in common,
but there is one important difference. The frail elderly - and
healthy seniors - have spokespersons to help make their needs
known. Toddlers have no such help; when they try in the only
ways they can to let us know their human rights are being
violated, they are seldom taken seriously; instead they are
often ridiculed or even punished.
The young and the old cannot
manage all of their own physical care, and they need and deserve
respectful help. My first awareness of the similarities between
the very young and the very old took place in Ohio in 1982. My
mother-in-law Anabel, my son Jason, and I were visiting Anabel's
parents, then in their eighties. When it was time to leave, I
found Jason's shoes, and I began to help him put them on. I
happened to glance around the room, and smiled. There was
Anabel, kneeling down, tying Grandpa's shoelaces.
But the similarities go beyond
physical assistance. A few years ago, in my city, an
eighty-year-old woman, suffering from osteoporosis and
arthritis, was enjoying a rare excursion downtown. Painfully
stooped over, she slowly made her way down the street. At first,
she was ignored by the strangers she passed, and she felt lonely
among the crowds. Finally, someone noticed her, and spoke;
"Look at the hunchback!" Shocked, the woman said
nothing. Later, when she arrived home, she burst into tears, and
told the story to her son. She then added, wistfully, "They
used to say I was pretty."
At an outdoor gathering, I once
overheard a young mother scold her one-year-old: "Put on a
shirt, you look stupid!"
In a grocery store, a
four-year-old boy tried, unsuccessfully, to lift a heavy item
his father had just selected. Instead of helping his son, he
became angry, and swore at him.
The young and the old are often
criticized for things beyond their control, and they deserve our
understanding. The elderly should not be blamed for their
frailty and lost youth, nor should children be blamed for things
they have not yet learned to do. But the similarities in the way
society treats these two groups go deeper still.
Both groups find their needs
shoved aside when they interfere with the needs of others.
Seniors battle age discrimination in the workplace, while
families battle "no children allowed" policies in
housing. When both children and the elderly voice their
opinions, they often find it difficult to get our attention. It
is as though children are expected to "stay in their
place" - at home, at school, or in day care, while the
elderly are expected to "fade away" gracefully from
the rest of society. When they are not in "their
place" but happen to be present in a group of mixed ages,
both children and the elderly are expected to be quiet,
well-behaved, and non-demanding. There is something curious
going on here; after all, we have all been children in the past,
and - if we are fortunate - will also be elderly in the future.
Programs for children, and those
for seniors, naturally reflect these negative attitudes, and
tend to meet the needs of the institutions that isolate these
groups, overlooking their personal needs. More funds are
available for institutional care for the elderly than for the
type of care that could enable them to remain at home - as most
would wish. Similarly, legislators promise more day care
programs, rather than offering funding or tax incentives for
mothers that could allow babies and toddlers to remain at home,
as they would wish.
Both young and old clearly
deserve more choices in where and how they spend their time, and
they should not be so completely at the mercy of others'
decisions. Still, the need for expanded choices for seniors is
more acceptable in our society than is the concept of more
freedom for children, who are seen as somehow different in
nature than the rest of humanity, as property rather than as
human beings deserving of human rights.
In response to those who fear the
expansion of "children's rights", the educator John
Holt replied:
"If I had to make a
general rule for living and working with children, it might be
this: be very wary of saying or doing anything to a child that
you would not do to another adult, whose good opinion and
affection you valued. Of course, if we saw someone walking
toward an open manhole or some other grave danger, we would
shout, "Look out!" In this spirit we often and
rightly intervene in the lives of children.
"But this has almost
nothing to do with "adult authority", some kind of
general right and duty to tell children what to do. It would
be equally right and natural if an eight-year-old I know,
already an expert skier, should tell some adult that a certain
trail was probably too difficult for him, and that he should
stay off it. What is speaking here is not the authority of
age, but the authority of greater experience and
understanding, which does not necessarily have anything to do
with age."
It is not just eight-year-old
skiers who are expert enough about a matter to give us advice; a
newborn refusing a bottle is advising us - in the only way
available to her - of the superiority of breastfeeding; a baby
who cries when "put down" is an authority on the
critical importance of bonding through touch; a child who cries
in the night is communicating the wisdom of centuries of
families sleeping together.
We need to free ourselves from
age stereotypes, so that we can begin to appreciate and respect
others of all ages. But until we reach that point, legislation
and official spokespersons will be needed for young and old
alike.
Rejection and mistrust of
children and seniors is especially prevalent in North America;
in other cultures, are more warmly welcomed and accepted. In
Scandinavia, government subsidies allow the elderly to remain at
home, where they receive free meals, transportation, and care;
for children there are laws requiring the initiation of
breastfeeding, prohibiting spanking and bullying, and even
regulating the design of new buildings from a child's point of
view. Norway has a "Commissioner for Children", an
independent, public spokesperson who protects children's
interests - the first in the world.
These successful programs give us
hope and set examples for the work that lies ahead. We have
begun the process of legislating the rights of senior citizens,
and more needs to be done. We also need to consider the rights
of children, who cannot speak for themselves, and who are
therefore the most vulnerable group in our society.
As Dr. Seuss reminds us, "A
person's a person, no matter how small" - or how frail. We
should treat one another with love and respect, free from biases
and expectations based on age. When young and old are valued for
their ageless spirit within, we will all live more freely and
joyfully. |