Throughout human
history, breast-feeding mothers sleeping alongside their infants
constituted a marvelously adaptive system in which both the
mothers' and infants' sleep physiology and health were connected
in beneficial ways. By sleeping next to its mother, the infant
receives protection, warmth, emotional reassurance, and breast
milk - in just the forms and quantities that nature intended.
This sleeping arrangement permits mothers (and fathers) to
respond quickly to the infant if it cries, chokes, or needs its
nasal passages cleared, its body cooled, warmed, caressed,
rocked or held. This arrangement thus helps to regulate the
infant's breathing, sleep state, arousal patterns, heart rates
and body temperature. The mother's proximity also stimulates the
infant to feed more frequently, thus receiving more antibodies
to fight disease. The increased nipple contact also causes
changes in the mother's hormone levels that help to prevent a
new pregnancy before the infant is ready to be weaned. In this
way, the infant regulates its mother's biology, too; increased
breast-feeding blocks ovulation, which helps to ensure that
pregnancies will not ordinarily occur until the mother's body is
able to restore the fat and iron reserves needed for optimal
maternal health.
It is a curious fact that in Western societies the practice
of mothers, fathers and infants sleeping together came to be
thought of as strange, unhealthy and dangerous. Western parents
are taught that "co-sleeping" will make the infant too
dependent on them, or risk accidental suffocation. Such views
are not supported by human experience worldwide, however, where
for perhaps millions of years, infants as a matter of course
slept next to at least one caregiver, usually the mother, in
order to survive. At some point in recent history, infant
separateness with low parental contact during the night came to
be advocated by child care specialists, while infant-parent
interdependence with high parental contact came to be
discouraged. In fact, the few psychological studies which are
available suggest that children who have "co-slept" in
a loving and safe environment become better adjusted adults than
those who were encouraged to sleep without parental contact or
reassurance.
The fear of suffocating infants has a long and complex
cultural history. Since before the middle ages
"overlying" or suffocating infants deliberately was
common, particularly among the poor in crowded cities. This form
of infanticide led local church authorities to make laws
forbidding parents to let infants sleep next to them. The
practice of giving infants alcohol or opiates to get them to
sleep also became common; under such conditions, babies often
did not wake up, and it was presumed that the mothers must have
overlaid them. Also, in smoke-filled, under-ventilated rooms,
infants can easily succumb to asphyxia. Unfortunately, health
officials in some Western countries promote the message that
sleep contact between the mother and infant increases the
chances of the infant dying from sudden infant death syndrome
(SIDS). But the research on which this message is based only
indicates that bed-sharing can be dangerous when it occurs in
the context of extreme poverty or when the mother is a smoker.
Some researchers have attempted to export this message to other
cultures. However, in Japan, for example, where co-sleeping is
the norm, SIDS rates are among the lowest in the world, which
suggests that this arrangement may actually help to prevent
SIDS.
Human infants need constant attention and contact with other
human beings because they are unable to look after themselves.
Unlike other mammals, they cannot keep themselves warm, move
about, or feed themselves until relatively late in life. It is
their extreme neurological immaturity at birth and slow
maturation that make the mother-infant relationship so
important. The human infant's brain is only about 25% of its
adult weight at birth, whereas most other mammals are born with
60-90% of their adult brain size. The young of most other
mammals become independent of their parents within a year,
whereas humans take 14 to 17 years to become fully developed
physically, and usually longer than that to be fully
independent.
Apart from being a natural characteristic of our species,
constant proximity to the mother during infancy is also made
necessary by the need to feed frequently. Human milk is composed
of relatively low amounts of protein and fat, and high amounts
of quickly absorbed and metabolized sugars. Therefore the
infant's hunger cycle is short, as is the time spent in deep
sleep. All of these factors seem to indicate that the custom of
separating infants from their parents during sleep time is more
the result of cultural history than of fundamental physiological
or psychological needs. Sleep laboratory studies have shown that
bed-sharing, instead of sleeping in separate rooms, almost
doubled the number of breast-feeding episodes and tripled the
total nightly duration of breast-feeding. Infants cried much
less frequently when sleeping next to their mothers, and spent
less time awake. We think that the more frequently infants are
breast-fed, the less likely they are to die from cot death.
Our scientific studies of mother and infants sleeping
together have shown how tightly bound together the physiological
and social aspects of the mother-infant relationship really are.
Other studies have shown that separation of the mother and
infant has adverse consequences. Anthropological considerations
also suggest that separation between the mother and infant
should be minimal. Western societies must consider carefully how
far and under what circumstances they want to push infants away
from the loving and protective co-sleeping environment. Infants'
nutritional, emotional and social needs as well as maternal
responses to them have evolved in this environment for
millennia.