Almost every child, on the first day he sets foot in a school building, is smarter, more curious, less
afraid of what he doesn't know, better at finding and figuring things out, and more confident, resourceful,
persistent and independent than he will ever be again in his schooling - or, unless he is very unusual and
very lucky, for the rest of his life. Already, by paying close attention to and interacting with the world and
people around him, and without any school-type formal instruction, he has done a task far more difficult,
complicated and abstract than anything he will be asked to do in school, or than any of his teachers has done
for years. He has solved the mystery of language. He has discovered it - babies don't even know that language
exists - and he has found out how it works and learned to use it. He has done it by exploring, by
experimenting, by developing his own model of the grammar of language, by trying it out and seeing whether it
works, by gradually changing it and refining it until it does work. And while he has been doing this, he has
been learning other things as well, including many of the "concepts" that the schools think only
they can teach him, and many that are more complicated than the ones they do try to teach him.
|In he comes, this curious, patient, determined, energetic, skillful learner. We sit him down
at a desk, and what do we teach him? Many things. First, that learning is separate from living. "You come
to school to learn," we tell him, as if the child hadn't been learning before, as if living were out
there and learning were in here, and there were no connection between the two. Secondly, that he cannot be
trusted to learn and is no good at it. Everything we teach about reading, a task far simpler than many that
the child has already mastered, says to him, "If we don't make you read, you won't, and if you don't do
it exactly the way we tell you, you can't". In short, he comes to feel that learning is a passive
process, something that someone else does to you, instead of something you do for yourself.
In a great many other ways he learns that he is worthless, untrustworthy, fit only to take other people's
orders, a blank sheet for other people to write on. Oh, we make a lot of nice noises in school about respect
for the child and individual differences, and the like. But our acts, as opposed to our talk, says to the
child, "Your experience, your concerns, your curiosities, your needs, what you know, what you want, what
you wonder about, what you hope for, what you fear, what you like and dislike, what you are good at or not so
good at - all this is of not the slightest importance, it counts for nothing. What counts here, and the only
thing that counts, is what we know, what we think is important, what we want you to do, think and be."
The child soon learns not to ask questions - the teacher isn't there to satisfy his curiosity. Having learned
to hide his curiosity, he later learns to be ashamed of it. Given no chance to find out who he is - and to
develop that person, whoever it is - he soon comes to accept the adults' evaluation of him.
He learns many other things. He learns that to be wrong, uncertain, confused, is a crime. Right answers are
what the school wants, and he learns countless strategies for prying these answers out of the teacher, for
conning her into thinking he knows what he doesn't know. He learns to dodge, bluff, fake, cheat. He learns to
be lazy! Before he came to school, he would work for hours on end, on his own, with no thought of reward, at
the business of making sense of the world and gaining competence in it. In school he learns, like every buck
private, how to goldbrick, how not to work when the sergeant isn't looking, how to know when he is looking,
how to make him think you are working even when he is looking. He learns that in real life you don't do
anything unless you are bribed, bullied or conned into doing it, that nothing is worth doing for its own sake,
or that if it is, you can't do it in school. He learns to be bored, to work with a small part of his mind, to
escape from the reality around him into daydreams and fantasies - but not like the fantasies of his preschool
years, in which he played a very active part.
||The child comes to school curious about other people, particularly other children, and the
school teaches him to be indifferent. The most interesting thing in the classroom - often the only interesting
thing in it - is the other children, but he has to act as if these other children, all about him, only a few
feet away, are not really there. He cannot interact with them, talk with them, smile at them.
In fact, he learns how to live without paying attention to anything going on around him. You might say that
school is a long lesson in how to turn yourself off, which may be one reason why so many young people, seeking
the awareness of the world and responsiveness to it they had when they were little, think they can only find
it in drugs. Aside from being boring, the school is almost always ugly, cold, and inhuman.
And so, in this dull and ugly place, where nobody ever says anything very truthful, where everybody is
playing a kind of role, as in a charade where the teachers are no more free to respond honestly to the
students than the students are free to respond to the teachers or each other, where the air practically
vibrates with suspicion and anxiety, the child learns to live in a daze, saving his energies for those small
parts of his life that are too trivial for the adults to bother with, and thus remain his. It is a rare child
who can come through his schooling with much left of his curiosity, his independence or his sense of his own
dignity, competence and worth.
|Our compulsory school-attendance laws once served a humane and useful purpose. They protected
the children's right to some schooling, against those adults who would otherwise have denied it to them in
order to exploit their labor, in farm, store, mine or factory. Today the laws help nobody - not the schools,
not the teachers, not the children. To keep kids in school who would rather not be there costs the schools an
enormous amount of time and trouble - to say nothing of what it costs to repair the damage that these angry
and resentful prisoners do every time they get a chance. Every teacher knows that any kid in class who, for
whatever reason, would rather not be there, not only doesn't learn anything himself but makes it a great deal
tougher for anyone else. As for protecting the children from exploitation, the chief and indeed only
exploiters of children these days are the schools.
We need to get kids out of the school buildings, and give them a chance to learn about the world at first
hand. It is a very recent idea, and a crazy one, that the way to teach our young people about the world they
live in is to take them out of it and shut them up in brick boxes. Aside from their parents, most children
never have any close contact with any adults except people whose sole business is children. No wonder they
have no idea what adult life or work is like. A child learning to talk does not learn by being corrected all
the time - if corrected too much, he will stop talking. He compares, a thousand times a day, the difference
between language as he uses it and as those around him use it. Bit by bit, he makes the necessary changes to
make his language like other people's. In the same way, kids learning to do all the other things they learn
without adult teachers - to walk, run, climb, whistle, ride a bike, skate, play games, jump rope - compare
their own performance with what more skilled people do, and slowly make the needed changes. But in school we
never give a child a chance to detect his mistakes, let alone correct them. We do it all for him. We act as if
we thought he would never notice a mistake unless it was pointed out to him, or correct it unless he was made
to. Soon he becomes dependent on the expert. We should let him do it himself. Let him figure out what this
word says, what is the answer to that problem, whether this is a good way of saying or doing this or that. Our
job should be to help him when he tells us that he can't find a way to get the right answer. Let's get rid of
all this nonsense of grades, exams, marks. We don't know now, and we never will know, how to measure what
another person knows or understands. We certainly can't find out by asking him questions. All we find out is
what he doesn't know which is what most tests are for, anyway. Throw it all out, and let the child learn what
every educated person must someday learn, how to measure his own understanding, how to know what he knows or
does not know.
People remember only what is interesting and useful to them, what helps them make sense of the world, or
helps them get along in it. All else they quickly forget, if they ever learn it at all. The idea of a
"body of knowledge," to be picked up in school and used for the rest of one' s life, is nonsense in
a world as complicated and rapidly changing as ours. Anyway, the most important questions and problems of our
time are not in the curriculum, not even in the universities, let alone the schools.
Children want, more than they want anything else, and even after years of miseducation, to make sense of
the world, themselves, and other human beings. Let them get at this job, with our help if they ask for it, in
the way that makes most sense to them.
Excerpted from The Underachieving School,
CO: Sentient Publications, 2005. Reprinted with permission of Sentient Publications.
Originally published in The Saturday Evening Post, February 8, 1969.