|
Sociopathic
Parenting
by James Kimmel, Ph.D.
"The societies for the prevention of
cruelty to babies and children concern themselves only with the
grossest sort of abuse. Our society must be helped to see the gravity
of the crime against infants that is today considered normal
treatment."
Jean Liedloff, The Continuum
Concept1
Definitions: (From Webster's Dictionary)
Antisocial:
- not sociable
- harmful to the welfare of people
Asocial:
- avoiding contact with others
- selfish
Psychopathic personality:
- a person characterized by emotional
instability, lack of social judgment, perverse and impulsive (often
criminal) behavior, inability to learn from experience; amoral and
asocial feelings; and other personality defects.
Sociopath:
- A psychopathic personality whose behavior is
aggressively anti-social.
We live in a society that is rapidly becoming a
nation of sociopaths. The root cause of this is not the loss of family
values. Neither is it the consequence of parents who are in themselves
sociopaths or emotionally disturbed individuals. The cause, instead, is
the conventional, but abnormal, ways in which we rear our children. From
the moment of birth, children are deprived of that which humans evolved
to have – the prolonged nurturing natural to our species. We -
parents, community and government - are unwilling to make the commitment
to our children that is their birthright. We bring children into the
world - but do not accept our responsibility to be there to care for
them.
In our lack of commitment to our children they are
deprived of the human attachment that is their biological and genetic
"expectation" at birth. We deny them the biological mothering
experience that is the basis for human sociability and often, parcel
their care off to strangers, who usually have even less of a commitment
to them than we do. Because our children are not our first priority, the
best some of us can give them is "quality time". In a nation
of individuals whose major priority is "me," we perceive
caring for another, including our own children, as self-sacrifice and
loss of self. We seek more and better day-care centers but not the types
of help that could enable us to stay at home to care for our children.
Nor does our government offer financial help, as other nations do, that
allows at least one parent to be at home to care for their infant.
The fact that new human life is not our first and
foremost priority indicates that individual human life is not our
primary value. The ways in which we respond to infants, even when we do
value them, suggests that we do not know how to convey to them that they
are valuable. We are simply not friendly to the life we create.
Our ways of caring for infants and children are
actually sociopathic in that they are aggressively antisocial and
asocial. It is common practice to force infants to spend long periods of
time alone in their cribs, to sleep alone, and to ignore their crying,
so that they will leave us alone and learn to accept being alone.
Spanking, hitting and punishing children are widely accepted methods for
teaching children to behave. If we treated another adult the way we
commonly treat our children, we would be subject to criminal and/or
civil action. Imposing one's will on another person is considered a
crime in our society. Yet with children, it is actively encouraged. The
only conclusion is that children are not seen as persons.
In our efforts to get children to behave in the
ways we want, we utilize methods of control which are culturally
condoned forms of violence. Based on our long-standing traditional
belief that children are a form of property, we treat them as objects to
be manipulated and molded in directions that will be comfortable for us.
Peter and Judith Decourcy have expressed our
societal perception of children in the following passage:
In many ways we do not think of children as
people with the rights and privileges of adults. Physical punishment
and psychological harassment are considered acceptable methods of
controlling a child. Children are often punished in a variety of
unusual and ingenious ways that would not be tolerated in the most
backward adult prison, and the parents are not subjected to social
censure or legal interference. It is as if children were objects, bits
of property belonging to the parents, to be used in any way the
parents see fit.2
The strangest and most unrealistic part of our
child-rearing beliefs is that our antisocial behavior toward them is
supposed to make them become caring social beings. We are blind to the
fact that the parent-child relationship is the first and most formative
social relationship and the model for the child's interaction with
others. Our children are chiefly influenced in their development by who
we are in relation to them, not by who we think we are or pretend to be.
As Theodore Schwartz put it, "what is important in cultural
transmission is not so much what children are taught or not taught, but
the ways in which things happen to them and the attitudes of the people
around them with whom they are interacting."3
We act in relation to our children in ways that
are similar to the psychopathic personality. In our behavior toward
them, we are frequently emotionally unstable, perverse and impulsive. By
depriving them of our love and affection, and by punishing them to get
them to behave, we behave in amoral and asocial ways (sometimes
criminal). We lack social judgement in our belief that the way we behave
toward them will make them become social individuals. Our reluctance to
change the ways we relate to our children, even though we are
continually confronted by our failure to change their behavior,
indicates that we (community and nation, as well as parents) are unable
to learn from experience. By following our conventional infant care and
child-rearing practices, we are unwittingly training our children to
become sociopaths.
We may not in the totality of our individual lives
behave like sociopaths. Most of us are not criminals. But many of us are
sociopathic in the way we relate to our children. This is not because we
are as individuals deviants from the norm. We are the norm. We are
sociopathic parents because our child-rearing traditions, our own life
experiences as children, our culture, our government, and many of our
experts on infant and child care encourage us to be so.
1 Liedloff, Jean. Continuum
Concept. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1986.
2 Decourcy, Peter and Judith. A
Silent Tragedy: Child Abuse in the Community. New York: Alfred
Publishing.
3 Schwartz, Theodore,
"Socialization as Cultural Transmission." Berkeley: University
of California Press. As quoted in: Nanda, Serena, Cultural
Anthropology, Third Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing,
1987, p.131. |